[Paolo Aranha]

@terrainsvagues , you all at HC are really great!

• This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Paolo Aranha.

[Paolo Aranha]

It’s true, the display of CORE items on the personal profiles is currently puzzling. In fact, even a little space between each item would be an improvement, as currently it all looks like like an indistinct mass of hyperlinks.

[Paolo Aranha]

This is an excellent proposal! By the way, it wouldn’t be bad to introduce a “Like” function in Group Discussions like this. While I didn’t have much to add in substantial terms to Christopher Long’s proposal, I did want to express my support: a Facebook-style “Like” would serve the purpose!

[Paolo Aranha]

Colin, I think your analysis is very accurate: one of the many problems with Academia.edu is the lack of discussion and interaction.

I also would like to have some enhanced Analytics on HC, although I also think we should undertake a reflection on the best balance between each one’s right to privacy and the undeniable utility of data on the reception of our publications etc.

I have tried Academia.edu Premium for one month and I could check who was reading any of my articles. On the one hand this could be interesting, but on the other it was a sort of spying: very likely most of the readers didn’t even imagine that I could check them. I assume that a possible solution could be allowing each reader to decider whether to reveal or not the author about one’s own reading and downloading activities.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Paolo Aranha.

[Author]

Posts