Hi everyone, Thanks for bringing this up and I’m sorry we won’t get to see all of you in the session! However, Laura and I checked with Jennifer Diaz, and all sessions will be recorded and archived for later viewing. I hope some of you will also consider participating in the discussion here on HC before or after the conference!

I’d like to follow…[Read more]

I agree with Sara. This looks really interesting. Regrettably. I’ll be attending a workshop at that time.

Hi everyone,

We are still looking for volunteers for the Special Session Proposal Committee! If you are interested but would rather not post on the discussion board, feel free to email me directly: antares [at] pdx.edu.

Best,

Tara (and Laura)

One important clarification: you cannot submit a proposal if you are on the committee!

-Tara

Oh geez, yes. That’s on me. My apologies. The IG I attend most often is
still working out it’s 2021 activities . . .

(Right, Chris—had meant that the Xenakis celebration could wait for 2022.)

Hi everyone,

long-time listener, first-time ‘caller’ . . .

I like Antares’s ideas about pedagogy, and think that a session on that
would be timely—whether it’s carefully limited to post-1945 or not. So,
I’ll second that.

Maybe Xenakis waits until next year, where he hits that nice, round number?

Hi Amy, thanks for your thoughts! To clarify, this isn’t for the interest group meeting itself—this would be for a special session proposal that would go through the normal SMT proposal process. If accepted, it would be a normal paper session that is “sponsored” by the IG. This is something a few of the IGs have done in recent years. The special s…[Read more]

Hi Josh,

There was some discussion of this section on draft 2, and the consensus seemed to be that the language was adequate as it is now, which is why we left it that way in the next two drafts. Since we’re already voting, let’s see how the vote turns out, and if it becomes a problem, we can always revise it in the future.

Thanks!

Tara