-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Computer-Assisted Language Comparison in the group
Digital Humanists on Humanities Commons 4 years, 10 months agoDer computergestützte Sprachvergleich (Wu et al. 2020) hat zum Ziel, Sprachvielfalt und Sprachgeschichte mit Hilfe einer Mischung aus computerbasierten und nicht-automatischen aber formalen Methoden zu untersuchen und dadurch grundlegende Fragen zur Entwicklung spezifischer Sprachfamilien (Sagart et al. 2019) oder zur Typologie von Sprachvielfalt…[Read more]
-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Computer-Assisted Language Comparison on Humanities Commons 4 years, 10 months ago
Der computergestützte Sprachvergleich (Wu et al. 2020) hat zum Ziel, Sprachvielfalt und Sprachgeschichte mit Hilfe einer Mischung aus computerbasierten und nicht-automatischen aber formalen Methoden zu untersuchen und dadurch grundlegende Fragen zur Entwicklung spezifischer Sprachfamilien (Sagart et al. 2019) oder zur Typologie von Sprachvielfalt…[Read more]
-
Chance Bonar deposited 3 Apocryphal Apocalypse of John: A Translation and Introduction on Humanities Commons 4 years, 11 months ago
Introduction and translation of 3 Apocryphal Apocalypse of John, a Byzantine-era revelation dialogue between Abraham and John.
-
Chance Bonar's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 4 years, 11 months ago
-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Chances and Challenges for Quantitative Approaches in Chinese Historical Phonology in the group
Linguistics on Humanities Commons 5 years agoThe field of Chinese Historical Phonology is traditionally dealing with a large number of complex and diverse types of data. While the data diversity can be conveniently dealt with in qualitative approaches, computational possibilities that have arisen during the past two decades offer new possibilities and new challenges for the field. In the…[Read more]
-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Chances and Challenges for Quantitative Approaches in Chinese Historical Phonology in the group
Digital Humanities East Asia on Humanities Commons 5 years agoThe field of Chinese Historical Phonology is traditionally dealing with a large number of complex and diverse types of data. While the data diversity can be conveniently dealt with in qualitative approaches, computational possibilities that have arisen during the past two decades offer new possibilities and new challenges for the field. In the…[Read more]
-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Chances and Challenges for Quantitative Approaches in Chinese Historical Phonology in the group
Digital Humanists on Humanities Commons 5 years agoThe field of Chinese Historical Phonology is traditionally dealing with a large number of complex and diverse types of data. While the data diversity can be conveniently dealt with in qualitative approaches, computational possibilities that have arisen during the past two decades offer new possibilities and new challenges for the field. In the…[Read more]
-
Johann-Mattis List deposited Chances and Challenges for Quantitative Approaches in Chinese Historical Phonology on Humanities Commons 5 years ago
The field of Chinese Historical Phonology is traditionally dealing with a large number of complex and diverse types of data. While the data diversity can be conveniently dealt with in qualitative approaches, computational possibilities that have arisen during the past two decades offer new possibilities and new challenges for the field. In the…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thomas Miller's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month ago
-
Ted Underwood deposited Reclaiming Ground for the Humanities in the group
Victorian Studies on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month agoProjects that bridge the humanities and sciences often attract attention from journalists, but evoke dismay from humanists who feel that their subjects of expertise have been misinterpreted. For the humanities to reclaim a place of pride in public conversation, humanists themselves need to embrace interdisciplinarity and take the lead in this…[Read more]
-
Ted Underwood deposited Reclaiming Ground for the Humanities in the group
TC Digital Humanities on MLA Commons 5 years, 1 month agoProjects that bridge the humanities and sciences often attract attention from journalists, but evoke dismay from humanists who feel that their subjects of expertise have been misinterpreted. For the humanities to reclaim a place of pride in public conversation, humanists themselves need to embrace interdisciplinarity and take the lead in this…[Read more]
-
Ted Underwood deposited Reclaiming Ground for the Humanities in the group
Digital Humanists on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month agoProjects that bridge the humanities and sciences often attract attention from journalists, but evoke dismay from humanists who feel that their subjects of expertise have been misinterpreted. For the humanities to reclaim a place of pride in public conversation, humanists themselves need to embrace interdisciplinarity and take the lead in this…[Read more]
-
Ted Underwood deposited Reclaiming Ground for the Humanities on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month ago
Projects that bridge the humanities and sciences often attract attention from journalists, but evoke dismay from humanists who feel that their subjects of expertise have been misinterpreted. For the humanities to reclaim a place of pride in public conversation, humanists themselves need to embrace interdisciplinarity and take the lead in this…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship in the group
TM Libraries and Research on MLA Commons 5 years, 1 month agoThe current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship in the group
TC Digital Humanities on MLA Commons 5 years, 1 month agoThe current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship in the group
Library & Information Science on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month agoThe current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship in the group
Digital Humanists on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month agoThe current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship on Humanities Commons 5 years, 1 month ago
The current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of…[Read more]
-
Nicky Agate deposited HuMetricsHSS Code of Conduct in the group
TM Libraries and Research on MLA Commons 5 years, 1 month agoHuMetricsHSS strives to cultivate an academy that’s inclusive, open, collaborative, collegial, and generous. A scholarly life well-lived does not allow harassment in any form. This code of conduct governs the environment of our meetings, workshops, interactions, and communications, and exists to remind us of our values as we interact with others.
- Load More