-
Christopher Crosbie deposited “’Strange Serious Wantoning:’ Early Modern Chess Manuals and the Ethics of Virtuous Subterfuge in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 2 years, 9 months agoThis essay examines English Renaissance chess manuals in order to understand why chess, a game that encourages subterfuge and stratagem, was nonetheless figured as the paradigmatic example of a virtuous pastime. Particular attention is given to da Odenara Damiano’s The Pleasaunt and Wittie Playe of the Cheasts (1564), Arthur Saul’s The Famous Gam…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited “’Strange Serious Wantoning:’ Early Modern Chess Manuals and the Ethics of Virtuous Subterfuge” on Humanities Commons 2 years, 9 months ago
This essay examines English Renaissance chess manuals in order to understand why chess, a game that encourages subterfuge and stratagem, was nonetheless figured as the paradigmatic example of a virtuous pastime. Particular attention is given to da Odenara Damiano’s The Pleasaunt and Wittie Playe of the Cheasts (1564), Arthur Saul’s The Famous Gam…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited The Longleat Manuscript Reconsidered: Shakespeare and the Sword of Lath in the group
Shakespeare on Humanities Commons 2 years, 9 months agoThe Longleat Manuscript, the earliest known illustration of a Shakespearean play, contains three main components: a passage from the beginning of Titus Andronicus where Tamora pleads for her son’s life, lines from Aaron’s final confession, and a hand-drawn image that, apparently, corresponds with neither passage fully. Amid other mysteries, the…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited The Longleat Manuscript Reconsidered: Shakespeare and the Sword of Lath on Humanities Commons 2 years, 9 months ago
The Longleat Manuscript, the earliest known illustration of a Shakespearean play, contains three main components: a passage from the beginning of Titus Andronicus where Tamora pleads for her son’s life, lines from Aaron’s final confession, and a hand-drawn image that, apparently, corresponds with neither passage fully. Amid other mysteries, the…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited Aristotelian Time, Ethics, and the Art of Persuasion in Shakespeare’s Henry V in the group
Shakespeare on Humanities Commons 2 years, 11 months agoIn his response to the Dauphin, his threats before Harfleur’s walls, and his St. Crispin’s Day oration, Henry V deploys what we might call proleptic histories of the present as a means of rhetorical persuasion. Henry invites his audiences, that is, to imagine themselves in the future, understanding the present as part of their own history. Hen…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited Aristotelian Time, Ethics, and the Art of Persuasion in Shakespeare’s Henry V in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 2 years, 11 months agoIn his response to the Dauphin, his threats before Harfleur’s walls, and his St. Crispin’s Day oration, Henry V deploys what we might call proleptic histories of the present as a means of rhetorical persuasion. Henry invites his audiences, that is, to imagine themselves in the future, understanding the present as part of their own history. Hen…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited Aristotelian Time, Ethics, and the Art of Persuasion in Shakespeare’s Henry V in the group
Early Modern Theater on Humanities Commons 2 years, 11 months agoIn his response to the Dauphin, his threats before Harfleur’s walls, and his St. Crispin’s Day oration, Henry V deploys what we might call proleptic histories of the present as a means of rhetorical persuasion. Henry invites his audiences, that is, to imagine themselves in the future, understanding the present as part of their own history. Hen…[Read more]
-
Christopher Crosbie deposited Aristotelian Time, Ethics, and the Art of Persuasion in Shakespeare’s Henry V on Humanities Commons 2 years, 11 months ago
In his response to the Dauphin, his threats before Harfleur’s walls, and his St. Crispin’s Day oration, Henry V deploys what we might call proleptic histories of the present as a means of rhetorical persuasion. Henry invites his audiences, that is, to imagine themselves in the future, understanding the present as part of their own history. Hen…[Read more]