-
Michael L. Hays deposited Answer the Question, Question Authority, and Read Inclusively in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 5 months agoCritiques current status of relationship between scholarly research and academic teaching. Uses three examples–one each from Macbeth, Othello, and King Lear–to illustrate connections between both efforts.
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 73” as a Poetic Emblem in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoThis close reading addresses the couplet, puzzling because of its generality, which critics try to constrict by forced specificity. The quatrain-to-quatrain sequence of the image clusters suggests the theme of transitoriness and parallels The Order of The Burial of the Dead in The Book of Common Prayer, which burial ritual justifies the…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited “‘Othello Is Not about Race’” in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoReceived opinion based on scanty evidence and skimpy arguments holds that race and racism operate in important ways in Othello and Othello’s jealousy. Few specifically race-referential words and only one specifically racist image occur in the play, almost all in the first four scenes.
Brabantio’s, Roderigo’s, and Iago’s views are mistake…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Romancing the Sources: Framing Tales in Hamlet and King Lear in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoRomance as a group of, and label for, some of Shakespeare’s last plays presupposes the influence of later romance kinds, and Shakespeare studies presuppose their influence and preclude the influence of an earlier romance kind, namely, chivalric romance. This sub-genre includes romances like Bevis of Hampton and Guy of Warwick, both popular in S…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Emending Othello; Explaining Othello: A Critique of Contemporary Principles of and Practices in Editing Shakespeare and a Historical-Literary Interpretation of Othello’s Jealousy in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoModern editors of Othello unanimously and silently adopt the Folio (1623) text as their copy text but emend it in light of the quarto (1622) text at III, iii, 97. Neither of the two reasons for emendation, textual corruption or literary unintelligibility, applies. A critique of textual editing shows that, given knowledge of the many and various…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited A Sense of the Ending: Does Malcolm Earn It? in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoThis presentation asks whether Macbeth ends literally, as traditional criticism has viewed it, or ironically, as modern criticism would have it. Its answer emphasizes Malcolm’s role by detailing the Court Scene, which tests Malcolm, not MacDuff, to establish his character, legitimacy, and competence to rule. It shows this scene as a turning p…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Saving His Source: Shakespeare’s Use of Holinshed in Macbeth, IV, iii in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoThis presentation presents a critical overview and assessment of the pedagogical and critical treatment of the Court Scene, with particular attention to its use in modern political interpretations; places Malcolm in the thematic context established by Holinshed’s comparison of Duncan and Macbeth; puts the scene in the context of the play’s plo…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Sources, Scholarship, and Sense: Shakespeare’s Use of Holinshed in Macbeth in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months ago“Sources, Scholarship, and Sense: Shakespeare’s Use of Holinshed in Macbeth,” , (2003)
This presentation uses an analysis of Shakespeare’s primary source as a means to disclose modifications and retentions for the purpose of achieving both dramatic and narrative ends. Establishing the identity of “Bellona’s Bridegroome” as MacDuff enabl…[Read more]
-
Cristina León Alfar started the topic Welcome to Women also Know Literature in the discussion
Renaissance/ Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoWelcome to Women also Know Literature. If you are not yet a member, we hope that you will join us!
We are a group of literature scholars inspired by the efforts of “Women Also Know History,” which has launched an impressive website dedicated to promoting and supporting the work of women historians. We hope to do the same for women sc…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Review of The Dark Ages and the Age of Gold, by Russell Fraser in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoAssesses the characterization and distinctions between the medieval and renaissance periods, and finds them deficient and the supporting scholarship superficial.
-
Michael L. Hays deposited A Bibliography of Dramatic Adaptations of Medieval Romances and Renaissance Chivalric Romances First Available in English through 1616 in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoThis bibliography is divided into three parts. The first two parts encompass medieval romances first available in English before 1558. Part I includes romances by unknown or little-known authors or translators which others, as noted, regard as romances. Part II includes romances by those who are well known: Caxton, Chaucer, Gower, Henryson,…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Review of Shakespeare after Theory, by David Scott Kastan in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoAnalyzes the character and convictions of New Historicism, demonstrates its conflicting impulses and theoretical inadequacies, and critiques Kastan’s New Historical interpretation of “Macbeth.”
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Is Renaissance Shakespeare Medieval or Modern? in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoUses the survival of the English chivalric romance tradition throughout Shakespeare’s professional lifetime and his exploitation of that tradition especially in his major tragedies to challenge the commonplace distinction between the medieval and the renaissance on the one hand, and to suggest that his openness to that medieval tradition showed…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited What Means a Knight?: Red Cross Knight and Edgar in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoAnalyzes Spenser’s Red-Cross Knight and Shakespeare’s Edgar as chivalric knights in the tradition of English chivalric romance, and compares these writers’ attitudes toward the knights and the chivalry which they represent. Finds that, contrary to common interpretation, Spenser is the more modern, Shakespeare the more medieval, in their regar…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited Roles, Wrongs, and Revenge-Malvolio in Twelfth Night in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoEstablishes the division of characters between Maria/Toby/Feste and Malvolio, and their respective behaviors, characteristics, and values; shows the difficult, though sanctioned position, in which Malvolio’s role as steward places him; and traces Olivia’s (and later Orsino’s) regard for him in that role. Correlates the dichotomy between the two d…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited 0. Preliminaries, in Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance, 2nd ed in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months ago0. Preliminaries provide the usual guides to contents and graphics, and an unusual statement of acknowledgments. It also provides a preface which explains my approach to prevent possible misapprehensions because of its debt to, but also its departure from, source and influence studies. It addresses various critical issues: genre because of…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited 1. Introduction, in Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance, 2nd ed in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoChapter 1: Introduction provides on overview of the nature of English chivalric romances and an explanation of the historical circumstances of its particular vogue in late Elizabethan and early Jacobean England. It examines the biases in literary criticism—literary supersession and literary prefigurement, and neo-classical definitions of and r…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited 2. The Survival of English Chivalric Romances, in Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance, 2nd ed in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoChapter 2: The Survival of English Chivalric Romances provides an account of the documentary evidence of manuscripts, entries, printings, and adaptations which detail the survival of English chivalric romances. The discussion considers other cultural artifacts and related literary kinds which include materials from the tradition of these romances…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited 3. The Significance of English Chivalric Romance, in Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance, 2nd ed in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoChapter 3: The Significance of English Chivalric Romances describes the main features of English chivalric romances: all-embracing idealism; overarching motifs, like separation-and reunion, exile-and-return, sieges, and quests; typical characters: ladies, knights, stewards true or false, and fair unknowns; amatory motifs: courtly love,…[Read more]
-
Michael L. Hays deposited 4. Macbeth: Loyal Stewards and Royal Succession, in Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance, 2nd ed in the group
Renaissance / Early Modern Studies on Humanities Commons 7 years, 7 months agoChapter 4: Macbeth: Loyal Stewards and Royal Succession views the play as a romance defined by its overarching structure as exile-and-return of the rightful and qualified successor to the throne. Malcolm proves himself worthy in the Court Scene in England, where his test of Macduff demonstrates his ability, superior to his father’s, to establish “…[Read more]
- Load More