-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Paul’s Argument against Gentile Circumcision in Romans 2:17–29 in the group
Biblical Studies on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months agoThe majority of interpreters conclude that in Rom 2:17-29 Paul addresses an ethnic Jew. In contrast, Runar M. Thorsteinsson has argued recently that Paul addresses a gentile, specifically a gentile who has judaized and now thinks of himself as a Jew. This article provides further support for Thorsteinsson’s argument, arguing that Paul, contrary t…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Paul’s Argument against Gentile Circumcision in Romans 2:17–29 in the group
Ancient Jew Review on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months agoThe majority of interpreters conclude that in Rom 2:17-29 Paul addresses an ethnic Jew. In contrast, Runar M. Thorsteinsson has argued recently that Paul addresses a gentile, specifically a gentile who has judaized and now thinks of himself as a Jew. This article provides further support for Thorsteinsson’s argument, arguing that Paul, contrary t…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited The Many for One or One for the Many: Reading Mark 10:45 in the Roman Empire in the group
Religious Studies on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months agoThough the “many for one” political ideology was widespread in the first century CE, Mark 10:45 rejects this ideology. Instead, this type of rule is contrasted with Jesus’s own rule as a servant king, sacrificing himself (the one) for his followers (the many).
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited The Many for One or One for the Many: Reading Mark 10:45 in the Roman Empire in the group
Biblical Studies on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months agoThough the “many for one” political ideology was widespread in the first century CE, Mark 10:45 rejects this ideology. Instead, this type of rule is contrasted with Jesus’s own rule as a servant king, sacrificing himself (the one) for his followers (the many).
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited The Many for One or One for the Many: Reading Mark 10:45 in the Roman Empire in the group
Ancient Jew Review on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months agoThough the “many for one” political ideology was widespread in the first century CE, Mark 10:45 rejects this ideology. Instead, this type of rule is contrasted with Jesus’s own rule as a servant king, sacrificing himself (the one) for his followers (the many).
-
Jordan Rosenblum's profile was updated on AJS Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
-
Jordan Rosenblum changed their profile picture on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
-
Jordan Rosenblum's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans: The Problem of Identification on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
This essay summarizes Runar Thorsteinsson’s groundbreaking book, Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans 2, and situates the remaining essays in the volume.
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Paul’s So-Called Jew and Lawless Lawkeeping on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
This essay reexamines the logic of Paul’s argument in Romans 2, in light of Jewish traditions that insisted that God gave Israel, and Israel alone, the law.
-
Michael Rosenberg's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Aseneth’s Eight-Day Transformation as Scriptural Justification for Conversion on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
The author of Joseph and Aseneth writes a lengthy narrative about Aseneth’s conversion, thereby providing a justification for Joseph’s marriage to an Egyptian woman. The author explicitly connects her seven-day period of withdrawal to creation, thus portraying her conversion as a divinely wrought new creation. In addition, her eight-day con…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited A Buried Pentateuchal Allusion to the Resurrection in Mark 12:25 on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
This article seeks to determine the Pentateuchal background for Jesus’s arguments regarding the resurrection of the dead.
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited ‘The Rock Was Christ’: The Fluidity of Christ’s Body in 1 Cor. 10.4 on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
Paul’s identification of Christ with the rock that provided water to Israel in the wilderness has confounded interpreters. This article seeks to demonstrate that Paul depends upon a tradition within early Jewish thinking, as evidenced in poetic works such as Deuteronomy 32, Psalm 78, and Psalm 95, which linked Israel’s God to this rock. Des…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Revisiting the Proselutos in ‘the LXX’ on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
One of the more heated lexical debates in LXX studies surrounds the meaning of the Greek term proselutos. Yet the only thorough examination of the word in the LXX is W.C. Allen’s 1894 article, “On the Meaning of proselutos in the Septuagint,” which argues that the LXX translators distinguish carefully between two different uses of ger in the Hebre…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Abolishers of the Law in Early Judaism and Matthew 5,17–20 on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
Matthew’s use of (kata)luō in Matt 5:17-20 needs to be understood in light of other occurrences of these words in Jewish literature. This paper focuses on two historical events around which these words cluster: the Antiochan persecution and the destruction of the Temple. Since Jewish literature characterizes the Hellenizers of the Maccabean pe…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Luke 2:22, Leviticus 12, and Parturient Impurity on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
In Luke 2:22 Luke attributes parturient impurity to both Mary and Jesus (and/or Joseph). Interpreters have often concluded that this verse demonstrates that Luke misunderstands the levitical legislation pertaining to childbirth impurity (Leviticus 12), which discusses only the impurity of the new mother. This article argues that, despite the…[Read more]
-
This article reassesses the textual evidence for Genesis 17:14.
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited The Function of a Conjunction: Inclusivist or Exclusivist Strategies in Ezra 6.21 and Nehemiah 10.29–30? on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
In spite of the genealogical exclusion of non-Israelites evidenced throughout Ezra-Nehemiah, numerous scholars find strategies of inclusivism within the work. In particular, Ezra 6.19-21 and Neh. 10.29-30 have been understood to envision the incorporation of outsiders into the Golah group. After surveying the evidence for exclusivism in…[Read more]
-
Matthew Thiessen deposited Hebrews 12.5–13, the Wilderness Period, and Israel’s Discipline on Humanities Commons 8 years, 9 months ago
Since the author of Hebrews locates his readers in Israel’s wilderness period in Heb 3.1-4.11 and 11.8-39, the discussion of paideia in 12.5-13 should be interpreted in light of early Jewish conceptions of Israel’s time in the wilderness. Confirmation that this is the correct context in which to understand 12.5-13 will be found in Deuteronomy, Wis…[Read more]
- Load More