• Feminist and multispecies anthropologies have decentered those most visible to appreciate the
    perspectives of those othered in society—but also to better understand society at large. This article
    goes beyond decentering the human toward decentering another analytical focus: the species
    dyad. Building on previous work on gender–species intersectionality and multispecies ethnography,
    as well as drawing on a set of five ethnographic and multispecies fieldwork studies involving
    gendered relations between humans, cattle, and horses on three continents, this article offers
    a conceptualization of the multispecies triad by outlining a multispecies intersectionality theory.
    This entails acknowledging the intersectionality of five sets of relations: (1) species as a power
    relation beyond biology; (2) intersecting power relations of humans (such as gender and ethnicity
    as well as local categories); (3) humans’ organization of nonhumans into intraspecies categories (by
    for example sex, breed, age as well as local categories); (4) nonhumans’ own intraspecies power
    relations; and (5) nonhumans’ relations to intraspecies groups of other species (including human
    subgroups). By situating a multispecies triad in this multispecies intersectionality, the article shows
    how relations of power intersect within and across species with consequences for individuals and
    groups of all species involved. Multispecies intersectionality can thus be of interest even to scholars
    primarily interested in humans.