• Writing a factual or fictional dream is a difficult task as its ›otherness‹ will challenge all of our accustomed modes of narration. So the existence of established cultural and textual patterns is a welcome help. This collection of essays describes these patterns, their historical and individual modifications and their relation to the dream-discourse in selected case studies and general considerations. The scope of the contributions ranges geographically from the Near East and Europe to Northern America, Africa, China and Japan and historically from Antiquity to the present, including studies on the Old Testament, the Babylonian Talmud, Dante, Tang Xianzu, La Fontaine, Cáo Xuěqín, Bräker, Jean Paul, Manzoni, Heine, Keller, Freud, Sōseki, Schnitzler, McCay, Éluard, Bâ, Sassine, Fantouré, Kipphardt, Bächler, Sarris, Gaiman and others.

    • Manfred Engel, thank you for depositing the introductory essay to this collection. I am intrigued by your article on the German poets described as “Comparing the literaricized dream-report with the empirical one shows the workings of two different concepts of factual dream-notation: whereas the latter tries to remain faithful to the memorized dream, the former strives for the creation of a plausible dream-experience for the reader.” I am intrigued by the possible relations between fidelity and plausibility. Once the library reopens…