• This study examines the euhemeristic interpretation of Genesis 6:1–4 as it appears in Ephrem
    of Nisibis’ Commentary on Genesis and its influence on Syriac and Ethiopic commentary
    traditions. I suggest that Ephrem’s attempt to mitigate the angelic interpretation of Genesis
    6 ironically mirrors his own angelology. The distinctive components he adds to the Watchers
    myth (different geography, diet, and bodies) are central virtues in Ephrem’s attempt to make
    virginity and monasticism ideals for all Christians. For Ephrem, the angels are paradigms of
    these ideals, and those who achieve them become equal to the angels. Surprisingly, these
    distinctive components reappear in the Ethiopian commentary tradition on Genesis (andemta),
    but unlike Ephrem, the andemta makes the equation of Sethites with angels and monks quite
    explicit. Overall, this analysis between Ephrem and the andemta reveals the influence of Syriac interpretation on the Ethiopian commentary tradition as well as the centrality of angelology in the Sethite reading of Genesis 6:1–4.