Thank you for your thoughts, Mitch!

1a—I’m fine with putting that in this draft. I don’t see any reason why people would oppose it being more inclusive. I think we should discuss that (along with the 3-year terms) at the meeting explicitly, though.
1b—I left them out just in case we want to add another award someday, so we don’t have to amend the bylaws just for that.
2—I modeled these on the DISMUS group’s bylaws as well as the SMT’s, and for whatever reason, neither of them have an article like that.